The decision by Cardinal Law to allow sexually abusive priests to continue with their duties after receiving "medical intervention" raises some interesting issues. First and foremost, who medically intervened, and what are their credentials? While the scandal in the Church is certainly, well, scandalous, the situation appears to offer a great opportunity to legally attack the credibility of most human sexuality research and studies. It is such research, of course, which has led to the increasingly widespread belief that homosexuality is, at the very least, the equivalent of race and ethnicity. However, once it is shown that the entire basis of this research was formed out of unethical and criminal conduct (e.g., sexually molestation of children), the whole house of cards that is human sexuality studies will tumble. The trick now, of course, is to get the Church to sue those people whom they foolishly relied upon for advice in dealing with sexaully aberrant (i.e., homosexual) priests.