I Just Knew One Would Pop Up
freekobe.com
Saturday, July 26, 2003
Thursday, July 24, 2003
It's Almost Like Having a Coach on the Playing Field
Contrary to my expectations, I have been chosen to serve as an alternate juror in a criminal case. My theory for why this has occurred is as follows: The jury selection process had been dragging on for three days, it was getting near the end of the work day when I was finally called to be interviewed, the case is not expected to go longer than a week and a half, the 12 member jury had just been set, and alternate jurors don't get to vote. Taken all together, I guess the attorneys in the case just didn't really care that I'm a lawyer. Nevertheless, once the trial is over, I think I'm going to ask the attorneys why they decided to leave me in as an alternate at the risk of my having to become a voting juror and influencing how other jurors vote.
Contrary to my expectations, I have been chosen to serve as an alternate juror in a criminal case. My theory for why this has occurred is as follows: The jury selection process had been dragging on for three days, it was getting near the end of the work day when I was finally called to be interviewed, the case is not expected to go longer than a week and a half, the 12 member jury had just been set, and alternate jurors don't get to vote. Taken all together, I guess the attorneys in the case just didn't really care that I'm a lawyer. Nevertheless, once the trial is over, I think I'm going to ask the attorneys why they decided to leave me in as an alternate at the risk of my having to become a voting juror and influencing how other jurors vote.
Tuesday, July 15, 2003
New Lows in Our Ever Declining Culture
Hunting for Bambi is the brainchild of Michael Burdick. Men pay anywhere from $5000 to $10,000 for the chance to come to the middle of the desert to shoot what they call "Bambis" with a paint ball gun. Burdick says men have come from as far away as Germany. The men get a video tape of their hunt to take home and show their friends.
What are "Bambis" you may ask? Click here to read the full story. It's pretty sad...and disturbing.
Hunting for Bambi is the brainchild of Michael Burdick. Men pay anywhere from $5000 to $10,000 for the chance to come to the middle of the desert to shoot what they call "Bambis" with a paint ball gun. Burdick says men have come from as far away as Germany. The men get a video tape of their hunt to take home and show their friends.
What are "Bambis" you may ask? Click here to read the full story. It's pretty sad...and disturbing.
Thursday, July 10, 2003
It Could Be Pure (P)BS
Anyone catch a glimpse of the Martin Luther docudrama? I understand it's pretty one-sided (i.e., anti-Catholic).
Anyone catch a glimpse of the Martin Luther docudrama? I understand it's pretty one-sided (i.e., anti-Catholic).
Tuesday, July 08, 2003
Wednesday, July 02, 2003
Consecrated Virgins: Not Just Nuns
Since this article limits its discussion to women, I'd be kind of curious to know if lay men ever do this.
Since this article limits its discussion to women, I'd be kind of curious to know if lay men ever do this.
Monday, June 30, 2003
Sunday, June 29, 2003
Human Dignity?
I was watching a Sunday talking heads show this morning, and of course one of the topics of discussion was the Supreme Court's recent decision to make same-sex sodomy a constitutional right. In typically evading any discussion of the Court's end-run on Tenth Amendment, and the fact that there is no right to privacy in the Constitution, one of the left-liberal talking heads said that he supported the Court's decision because the law in question had "oppressed" homosexuals by depriving them of their human dignity. I heard this and thought to myself, how is a homosexually oriented person's dignity being suppressed by a law that prohibits behavior that is intrinsically undignified? Sad is the day when our society and culture includes within the standard of human dignity conduct that is both biologically and morally unnatural. Oro pro nobis.
I was watching a Sunday talking heads show this morning, and of course one of the topics of discussion was the Supreme Court's recent decision to make same-sex sodomy a constitutional right. In typically evading any discussion of the Court's end-run on Tenth Amendment, and the fact that there is no right to privacy in the Constitution, one of the left-liberal talking heads said that he supported the Court's decision because the law in question had "oppressed" homosexuals by depriving them of their human dignity. I heard this and thought to myself, how is a homosexually oriented person's dignity being suppressed by a law that prohibits behavior that is intrinsically undignified? Sad is the day when our society and culture includes within the standard of human dignity conduct that is both biologically and morally unnatural. Oro pro nobis.
Friday, June 27, 2003
Conservative Court?
The Rehnquist Court is often depicted by Democrats and liberals as being "conservative" because seven of the nine current justices were appointed by Republican Presidents. But if you were to survey its decisions over the past several years on social hot button issues like abortion, affirmative action and gay sodomy, the Court has been anything but conservative. Thus, the Left ought to stop wringing its hands about the possibility of Bush appointing a new Supreme Court justice. If anyone should be expressing concern, its conservatives like myself who don't want to see another Souter, Stevens, O'Connor, and Kennedy appointed.
Come to think of it, given the rich history of Republican Presidents naming liberal activist justices to the Supreme Court (Earl Warren was an Eisenhower appointment and Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe v. Wade, was appointed by Nixon) I'm suprised more liberal Democrats don't vote for Republican Presidential candidates.
The Rehnquist Court is often depicted by Democrats and liberals as being "conservative" because seven of the nine current justices were appointed by Republican Presidents. But if you were to survey its decisions over the past several years on social hot button issues like abortion, affirmative action and gay sodomy, the Court has been anything but conservative. Thus, the Left ought to stop wringing its hands about the possibility of Bush appointing a new Supreme Court justice. If anyone should be expressing concern, its conservatives like myself who don't want to see another Souter, Stevens, O'Connor, and Kennedy appointed.
Come to think of it, given the rich history of Republican Presidents naming liberal activist justices to the Supreme Court (Earl Warren was an Eisenhower appointment and Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe v. Wade, was appointed by Nixon) I'm suprised more liberal Democrats don't vote for Republican Presidential candidates.
Thursday, June 26, 2003
California SOL on SOL Law
With direct impact on the Situation, the SCOTUS strikes down a California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for criminal cases involving child molestation.
With direct impact on the Situation, the SCOTUS strikes down a California law that retroactively eliminated the statute of limitations for criminal cases involving child molestation.
Throwin' the Baby Out with the Bath Water
While I wasn't surprised to learn today that the SCOTUS had struck down Texas' anti-sodomy law, I was thrown for a loop when I read that the Court did it by overturning Bowers v. Hardwick, a SCOTUS case from 1986 which had basically held that there was no fundamental right to engage in homosexual conduct. Wow.
While I wasn't surprised to learn today that the SCOTUS had struck down Texas' anti-sodomy law, I was thrown for a loop when I read that the Court did it by overturning Bowers v. Hardwick, a SCOTUS case from 1986 which had basically held that there was no fundamental right to engage in homosexual conduct. Wow.
Wednesday, June 25, 2003
Rape Victim Allowed to Give Birth to Child
More or less sidestepping the issue of whether a pre-born child can be appointed a guardian, a Flori(duh) judge approves a retarded rape victim's medical plan that says carrying her pregnancy to term is in her best interest.
More or less sidestepping the issue of whether a pre-born child can be appointed a guardian, a Flori(duh) judge approves a retarded rape victim's medical plan that says carrying her pregnancy to term is in her best interest.
Latest (Personal) Religious Liberty News
In a case that I am involved in from a representational standpoint, a federal district court judge in So. Cal. has ruled that Section 2(a) of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), as applied through Section 2(a)(2)(C) of said statute, is unconstitutional. Harkening back to the rationale used by the SCOTUS to strike down the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act the federal judge in my case basically said that in enacting the RLUIPA, or the portion that he just struck down, Congress exceeded its constitutional authority.
Next stop -- the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
In a case that I am involved in from a representational standpoint, a federal district court judge in So. Cal. has ruled that Section 2(a) of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), as applied through Section 2(a)(2)(C) of said statute, is unconstitutional. Harkening back to the rationale used by the SCOTUS to strike down the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act the federal judge in my case basically said that in enacting the RLUIPA, or the portion that he just struck down, Congress exceeded its constitutional authority.
Next stop -- the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If Anyone Should be Investigated and Prosecuted Under RICO...
...it ought to be the baby butchers at Planned Parenthood. How many botched abortions have they committed and covered up? How systematic is the failure by Planned Parenthood clinics to fully inform prospective clients on the health risks of obtaining an abortion? Are you listening John Ashcroft?
...it ought to be the baby butchers at Planned Parenthood. How many botched abortions have they committed and covered up? How systematic is the failure by Planned Parenthood clinics to fully inform prospective clients on the health risks of obtaining an abortion? Are you listening John Ashcroft?
Tuesday, June 24, 2003
New PC Term for Left-Liberal Racism
"Positive Race Bias" -- first seen or heard (by me, at least) here.
"Positive Race Bias" -- first seen or heard (by me, at least) here.
Monday, June 23, 2003
Latest From SCOTUS
Internet filters in public libaries ok, affirmative action in public universities more or less ok, state anti-sodomy laws -- decision likely to come on Thursday (if it is struck down, it will likely be on Equal Protection grounds because the law in question is limited to same sex sodomizers).
Internet filters in public libaries ok, affirmative action in public universities more or less ok, state anti-sodomy laws -- decision likely to come on Thursday (if it is struck down, it will likely be on Equal Protection grounds because the law in question is limited to same sex sodomizers).
Friday, June 20, 2003
To Hell With The Establishment Clause!
Content to ascribe the bad acts of several bishops on the whole hierarchy, and viewing the Church as nothing more than an international institution that is comparable to La Cosa Nostra, Car(b)ozo School of Law Pinhead demands that the Federal government criminally prosecute the Church under RICO.
A federal RICO prosecution would force the Church to confront its problems more directly by forcing it to face a federal prosecutorial juggernaut, as opposed to isolated local actions. While worthwhile, commendable, and necessary, these local prosecutions are not enough to prompt the thoroughgoing national, institutional reforms needed.
Content to ascribe the bad acts of several bishops on the whole hierarchy, and viewing the Church as nothing more than an international institution that is comparable to La Cosa Nostra, Car(b)ozo School of Law Pinhead demands that the Federal government criminally prosecute the Church under RICO.
A federal RICO prosecution would force the Church to confront its problems more directly by forcing it to face a federal prosecutorial juggernaut, as opposed to isolated local actions. While worthwhile, commendable, and necessary, these local prosecutions are not enough to prompt the thoroughgoing national, institutional reforms needed.
Dismissed
Norma McCorvy's Rule 60 motion to repoen and reverse Roe v. Wade was dismissed by a federal court judge. Failure to file the motion within a "reasonable time" is cited. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Norma McCorvy's Rule 60 motion to repoen and reverse Roe v. Wade was dismissed by a federal court judge. Failure to file the motion within a "reasonable time" is cited. Disappointing, but not surprising.
Thursday, June 19, 2003
A Potential SCOTUS Case
Kansas State Attorney General says all abortions performed on a child under 16 MUST be reported to state authorities. The rationale for the requirement stems from the fact that sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 is illegal in Kansas, and the pregnancy may be a result and evidence of sexual abuse. Sounds perfectly reasonable and legitimate to me.
Kansas State Attorney General says all abortions performed on a child under 16 MUST be reported to state authorities. The rationale for the requirement stems from the fact that sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 is illegal in Kansas, and the pregnancy may be a result and evidence of sexual abuse. Sounds perfectly reasonable and legitimate to me.
California Judges and The Boy Scouts (cont.)
By a somewhat surprising unanimous vote, the California State Supreme Court has revised the state's Code of Judicial Ethics to where state court judges will now have to seriously think twice about being associated with "anti-gay" groups like the Boy Scouts.
Because the Scouting group bans gays, judges must disclose membership when it has "the potential to give an appearance of partiality," the court said in amending the state's Code of Judicial Ethics. The court added language to the ethics code suggesting that judges disqualify themselves from cases where membership in an anti-gay group could be viewed as a conflict.
I've read the language of the amendments, and I suppose it is somewhat of a comfort that the Court decided not to go full board and outright prohibit state judges from having an association with groups like the Boy Scouts (that would be unconstitutional). Nevertheless, there are some problems with the amendments that ultimately may have to be resolved through the litigation process. From a work standpoint, I would invite this, but from a taxpayer perspective, this is just another example of why liberals should never be given power to appoint judges.
By a somewhat surprising unanimous vote, the California State Supreme Court has revised the state's Code of Judicial Ethics to where state court judges will now have to seriously think twice about being associated with "anti-gay" groups like the Boy Scouts.
Because the Scouting group bans gays, judges must disclose membership when it has "the potential to give an appearance of partiality," the court said in amending the state's Code of Judicial Ethics. The court added language to the ethics code suggesting that judges disqualify themselves from cases where membership in an anti-gay group could be viewed as a conflict.
I've read the language of the amendments, and I suppose it is somewhat of a comfort that the Court decided not to go full board and outright prohibit state judges from having an association with groups like the Boy Scouts (that would be unconstitutional). Nevertheless, there are some problems with the amendments that ultimately may have to be resolved through the litigation process. From a work standpoint, I would invite this, but from a taxpayer perspective, this is just another example of why liberals should never be given power to appoint judges.
Wednesday, June 18, 2003
Virgin Mary Sighting
This one is at a hospital in Boston, and its apparently causing quite a fuss. Although I certainly believe there are, and have been, real apparitions of the Blessed Mother, I'm sort of curious how the number of alleged Virgin Mary sightings compares to the number of Elvis sightings.
This one is at a hospital in Boston, and its apparently causing quite a fuss. Although I certainly believe there are, and have been, real apparitions of the Blessed Mother, I'm sort of curious how the number of alleged Virgin Mary sightings compares to the number of Elvis sightings.
Tuesday, June 17, 2003
Taking on 'Drew
This may be one of my favorite all time 'blogs. I say "may" because given the relatively large attrition rate in blogville, who knows how long the owner will be committed to maintaining and updating it.
This may be one of my favorite all time 'blogs. I say "may" because given the relatively large attrition rate in blogville, who knows how long the owner will be committed to maintaining and updating it.
Rule 60
Regarding the post immediately below, Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure basically says that a party seeking relief from a final judgment may have their case reheard for the purposes of overturning it if there was a mistake in the original proceeding, there is newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered at the time of trial, fraud, a void judgment, or any other reason that would justify relief. Especially worth noting in Rule 60 is the time period in which a motion can be made. As to mistake, discovery of new evidence, and fraud, a Rule 60 motion must be made within 1 year of the final judgment. For all other reasons, a motion must be made within a "reasonable time".
So does Ms. McCorvey have a shot? Again, I hope so. But the pessimist inside of me says probably not.
Regarding the post immediately below, Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure basically says that a party seeking relief from a final judgment may have their case reheard for the purposes of overturning it if there was a mistake in the original proceeding, there is newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered at the time of trial, fraud, a void judgment, or any other reason that would justify relief. Especially worth noting in Rule 60 is the time period in which a motion can be made. As to mistake, discovery of new evidence, and fraud, a Rule 60 motion must be made within 1 year of the final judgment. For all other reasons, a motion must be made within a "reasonable time".
So does Ms. McCorvey have a shot? Again, I hope so. But the pessimist inside of me says probably not.
"Roe" Sues to Overturn '73 Decision
Norma McCorvey, "Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade, has made the interesting procedural move of filing a Rule 60 motion to reopen the infamous case that made abortion a constitutional right. While I hope Ms. McCorvey, who is now pro-life and Catholic, succeeds, I personally don't think this move to try and overturn Roe v. Wade will work. I think there is a big time problem, and I'm not entirely certain that a winning party in a civil rights case can later come back to try and overturn a "favorable" decision. (Thanks Emily for the heads-up on the article link).
Update: Apparently, there have been instances where a winning party has come back on a Rule 60 motion to overturn a favorable decision. One such case would be Agostini v. Felton. Guess I need to pay more attention to some of the articles I link.
Norma McCorvey, "Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade, has made the interesting procedural move of filing a Rule 60 motion to reopen the infamous case that made abortion a constitutional right. While I hope Ms. McCorvey, who is now pro-life and Catholic, succeeds, I personally don't think this move to try and overturn Roe v. Wade will work. I think there is a big time problem, and I'm not entirely certain that a winning party in a civil rights case can later come back to try and overturn a "favorable" decision. (Thanks Emily for the heads-up on the article link).
Update: Apparently, there have been instances where a winning party has come back on a Rule 60 motion to overturn a favorable decision. One such case would be Agostini v. Felton. Guess I need to pay more attention to some of the articles I link.
Monday, June 16, 2003
Persecuted Church Simulation Results in a Lawsuit
Why anyone would want to participate in a simulated situation where your life is conditioned upon renouncing your faith is beyond me. I don't know about you, but I sort of see this activity as being the equivalent of self-mutilation. It'll be interesting to see how this suit plays out.
Why anyone would want to participate in a simulated situation where your life is conditioned upon renouncing your faith is beyond me. I don't know about you, but I sort of see this activity as being the equivalent of self-mutilation. It'll be interesting to see how this suit plays out.
Friday, June 13, 2003
Catholic Conference of Illinois Says Leave Behind Left Behind
Speaking of shrill fundamentalism, I recently got into a theological debate with a co-worker who subscribes to a number of anti-Catholic beliefs. In order to better clarify many of the points I incoherently made to him, I loaned him Karl Keating's "Catholicism and Fundamentalism" and Paul Thigpen's "The Rapture Trap". Although the latter book is more critical in tone than apologetic, it doesn't go down the path of singling out any one particular Christian faith and characterizing it as apostate or unchristian. In return, my co-worker tried to get me to read a blatantly anti-Catholic screed called The Gospel According to Rome by James McCarthy. Needless to say, I politely turned his offer down.
In case you don't know who Mr. McCarthy is, he is a Protestant fundamentalist author/apologist who claims he used to be Catholic (for some stange reason, a lot of fundamentalists and evangelicals will regard this as a qualifying factor for making someone an expert on Catholicism). Various Catholic apologists and writers like Karl Keating in The Usual Suspects and Mario Derksen at Catholic Insight have pretty much exposed McCarthy to be an unintelligible dolt. I, myself, prefer to characterize him as a lying bigot. Anyway, I'm just glad this fundamentalist co-worker is only here for another month. Time can't go by faster for me.
Speaking of shrill fundamentalism, I recently got into a theological debate with a co-worker who subscribes to a number of anti-Catholic beliefs. In order to better clarify many of the points I incoherently made to him, I loaned him Karl Keating's "Catholicism and Fundamentalism" and Paul Thigpen's "The Rapture Trap". Although the latter book is more critical in tone than apologetic, it doesn't go down the path of singling out any one particular Christian faith and characterizing it as apostate or unchristian. In return, my co-worker tried to get me to read a blatantly anti-Catholic screed called The Gospel According to Rome by James McCarthy. Needless to say, I politely turned his offer down.
In case you don't know who Mr. McCarthy is, he is a Protestant fundamentalist author/apologist who claims he used to be Catholic (for some stange reason, a lot of fundamentalists and evangelicals will regard this as a qualifying factor for making someone an expert on Catholicism). Various Catholic apologists and writers like Karl Keating in The Usual Suspects and Mario Derksen at Catholic Insight have pretty much exposed McCarthy to be an unintelligible dolt. I, myself, prefer to characterize him as a lying bigot. Anyway, I'm just glad this fundamentalist co-worker is only here for another month. Time can't go by faster for me.
Maybe He's Anti-Christ
Some of our, as Kathy Shaidle would say, "Adorable little Protestant friends" are asserting that biblical prophecy is being threatened by President Bush's road map for peace in the Middle East. (Note: the report is in audio form)
Some of our, as Kathy Shaidle would say, "Adorable little Protestant friends" are asserting that biblical prophecy is being threatened by President Bush's road map for peace in the Middle East. (Note: the report is in audio form)
Wednesday, June 11, 2003
Keep an Eye on This Case
A Christian-based adoption agency in California has asked that a federal lawsuit filed against it by a lesbian couple be dropped. The lebians have alleged they were unlwfully discriminated against when they were told by the adoption agency that it preferred to place children with traditional "nuclear families".
A Christian-based adoption agency in California has asked that a federal lawsuit filed against it by a lesbian couple be dropped. The lebians have alleged they were unlwfully discriminated against when they were told by the adoption agency that it preferred to place children with traditional "nuclear families".
They Just Keeps On Tickin'
Rumored retirements from the Supreme Court start to fade, and Justice Stevens countinues to provide irrefutable evidence that he is a Grade A liberal judicial activist.
Rumored retirements from the Supreme Court start to fade, and Justice Stevens countinues to provide irrefutable evidence that he is a Grade A liberal judicial activist.
Tuesday, June 10, 2003
Ut Unum Sint?
As an unintended consequence, this article shows that the more dedicated the American judiciary is to the principle of stare decisis the more united, and Catholic-like, it becomes. Needless to say, the author of this article, Joanne Mariner, desires to see a more "fractionalized" judiciary that, from a theological perspective, has a stark resemblance to Protestantism.
As an unintended consequence, this article shows that the more dedicated the American judiciary is to the principle of stare decisis the more united, and Catholic-like, it becomes. Needless to say, the author of this article, Joanne Mariner, desires to see a more "fractionalized" judiciary that, from a theological perspective, has a stark resemblance to Protestantism.
Will Martha Have a White Ford Bronco Moment?
You gotta love celebrity justice. Before all this is done, I'd be willing to bet that in some manner Martha Stewart will become the "white collar" crime version of O.J. Simpson.
Stewart arrived at the FBI's downtown office via a street normally closed to traffic. She was advised of the penalties she would face should she fail to show up in court. Typically defendants must appear in court to listen to rules and procedures and to sign paperwork.
"It's something we have done in the past. It's not unusual," a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office said of the discreet way Stewart was processed.
The spokesman said similar arrangements have been made before in high-profile cases where officials see little risk of flight. Stewart was released without having to post bail and with no travel restrictions.
You gotta love celebrity justice. Before all this is done, I'd be willing to bet that in some manner Martha Stewart will become the "white collar" crime version of O.J. Simpson.
Stewart arrived at the FBI's downtown office via a street normally closed to traffic. She was advised of the penalties she would face should she fail to show up in court. Typically defendants must appear in court to listen to rules and procedures and to sign paperwork.
"It's something we have done in the past. It's not unusual," a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office said of the discreet way Stewart was processed.
The spokesman said similar arrangements have been made before in high-profile cases where officials see little risk of flight. Stewart was released without having to post bail and with no travel restrictions.
Monday, June 09, 2003
A Case to Watch
A public school teacher in Montana is fighting for her right to teach an independent after-school religious class on public school grounds. The school district claims that allowing the teacher to do so, even though she would be off the clock, would result in a...wait for it...violation of the separation between church and state.
A public school teacher in Montana is fighting for her right to teach an independent after-school religious class on public school grounds. The school district claims that allowing the teacher to do so, even though she would be off the clock, would result in a...wait for it...violation of the separation between church and state.
Saturday, June 07, 2003
LaHaye-isms
Taken from this article here's how Tim LaHaye tries to evade the charge that he isn't anti-Catholic:
"The Bible clearly speaks against the 'mystery of Babylon, mother of harlots,' " he said.
"It's a religious system that has invaded many religions, not just Roman Catholicism," LaHaye said. "Many Protestant religions have this mystery, Babylonish teaching that has people worshipping idols instead of the living God. It's not an attack on the Catholic church."
Double-speak at its finest, no? Reminds me of the typical Democrat Catholic mantra of personally being against abortion but supporting the right of a woman "to choose".
Update: Actually, here's a better example of "LaHayist" Logic. Adolfo Hisler, a white Anglo-Saxon, believes there are types of people in this world who are not fully human. Included in his list of "inferiors" are people of Jewish descent. Although one might be tempted to do so, it is wrong to accuse Hisler of being anti-Semitic, because along with Jews, he believes there are some types of white Anglo-Saxons (e.g., those who don't believe Jews are subhuman) who are as equally less than human. As such, if you are going to accuse Mr. Hisler of anything, accuse him of being anti-subhumanity. He is not attacking Jews.
Taken from this article here's how Tim LaHaye tries to evade the charge that he isn't anti-Catholic:
"The Bible clearly speaks against the 'mystery of Babylon, mother of harlots,' " he said.
"It's a religious system that has invaded many religions, not just Roman Catholicism," LaHaye said. "Many Protestant religions have this mystery, Babylonish teaching that has people worshipping idols instead of the living God. It's not an attack on the Catholic church."
Double-speak at its finest, no? Reminds me of the typical Democrat Catholic mantra of personally being against abortion but supporting the right of a woman "to choose".
Update: Actually, here's a better example of "LaHayist" Logic. Adolfo Hisler, a white Anglo-Saxon, believes there are types of people in this world who are not fully human. Included in his list of "inferiors" are people of Jewish descent. Although one might be tempted to do so, it is wrong to accuse Hisler of being anti-Semitic, because along with Jews, he believes there are some types of white Anglo-Saxons (e.g., those who don't believe Jews are subhuman) who are as equally less than human. As such, if you are going to accuse Mr. Hisler of anything, accuse him of being anti-subhumanity. He is not attacking Jews.
Another Anti-Life Decision
A Flori(duh) state appeals court says a husband can order the removal of his comatose wife's feeding tube. Oh yeah, the husband in this case stands to inherit $700K if his wife dies, and he wants to marry another woman with whom he already has a child.
A Flori(duh) state appeals court says a husband can order the removal of his comatose wife's feeding tube. Oh yeah, the husband in this case stands to inherit $700K if his wife dies, and he wants to marry another woman with whom he already has a child.
And Water is Wet and the Sky is Blue
The California Department of Education announces that homeschooling in the state is legal, even though it was never illegal.
The California Department of Education announces that homeschooling in the state is legal, even though it was never illegal.
Friday, June 06, 2003
While Stuff Hits the Fan in Phoenix...
A Church of the Nazarene minister in Florida tells police investigators that he can't remember if he had sexually abused a male minor.
A Church of the Nazarene minister in Florida tells police investigators that he can't remember if he had sexually abused a male minor.
Thursday, June 05, 2003
No Link for You!
The Dem Party hates kids so much that it won't even link a Democrats for Life page on its website. In response to a pro-life Democrat's suggestion that the party's absolutist position on baby-killing cost it some Senate seats in the last general election, one unnamed Dem Strategist (what are the odds this clown believes he/she is "tolerant"?) quipped, "It seems to me like this is a fringe group desperately in search of a little publicity here.” Meanwhile, the Dem Party continues to provide links to such "mainstream" groups like Anti-Catholics for Free Baby Butchery, the National Association of Gals (NAG), and various groups that promote hedonism and sodomy.
The Dem Party hates kids so much that it won't even link a Democrats for Life page on its website. In response to a pro-life Democrat's suggestion that the party's absolutist position on baby-killing cost it some Senate seats in the last general election, one unnamed Dem Strategist (what are the odds this clown believes he/she is "tolerant"?) quipped, "It seems to me like this is a fringe group desperately in search of a little publicity here.” Meanwhile, the Dem Party continues to provide links to such "mainstream" groups like Anti-Catholics for Free Baby Butchery, the National Association of Gals (NAG), and various groups that promote hedonism and sodomy.
Wednesday, June 04, 2003
Reason Five Million and Two for Why Barry Lynn is a First Rate Jerk
(Leftist) Americans United for the Separation of Church and State threaten to sue the U.S. Interior Department for a grant it made to help restore the church building where Paul Revere received the signal that the British were advancing. The stated reason for the threat: it's still an active church.
(Leftist) Americans United for the Separation of Church and State threaten to sue the U.S. Interior Department for a grant it made to help restore the church building where Paul Revere received the signal that the British were advancing. The stated reason for the threat: it's still an active church.
Tuesday, June 03, 2003
Question More or Less Answered
By this article, which I found via Amy Welborn's blog, the question I had below on the success rate of Protestant missionaries in converting Muslims has been impliedly answered: very low. As such, Protestant missionaries in the Middle East tend to focus their efforts on converting other Christians (namely, Orthodox and Eastern Rite (Chaldean) Catholics).
By this article, which I found via Amy Welborn's blog, the question I had below on the success rate of Protestant missionaries in converting Muslims has been impliedly answered: very low. As such, Protestant missionaries in the Middle East tend to focus their efforts on converting other Christians (namely, Orthodox and Eastern Rite (Chaldean) Catholics).
Monday, June 02, 2003
Still to Come...
...rulings from the SCOTUS on several major issues, including affirmative action, anti-sodomy laws, and public library Internet filters. One case that may be of significance to the Situation is Stogner v. California (natch), where the state is seeking to erase its statute of limitations in order to criminally prosecute a man who is charged with molesting his own daughter almost 50 years ago.
...rulings from the SCOTUS on several major issues, including affirmative action, anti-sodomy laws, and public library Internet filters. One case that may be of significance to the Situation is Stogner v. California (natch), where the state is seeking to erase its statute of limitations in order to criminally prosecute a man who is charged with molesting his own daughter almost 50 years ago.
Passing Thoughts
In working with and around a lot of Evangelicals, I hear the term "Bible-based" church thrown around a lot. However, since the Bible didn't actually come into existence until the latter part of the fourth century, would today's Evangelical or Fundamentalist consider third through fourth century Christians to have been part of a "Bible-based" church? And what exactly are the standards for being a Bible-based church, and who authoritatively enforces them?
In working with and around a lot of Evangelicals, I hear the term "Bible-based" church thrown around a lot. However, since the Bible didn't actually come into existence until the latter part of the fourth century, would today's Evangelical or Fundamentalist consider third through fourth century Christians to have been part of a "Bible-based" church? And what exactly are the standards for being a Bible-based church, and who authoritatively enforces them?
Sunday, June 01, 2003
Saturday, May 31, 2003
Islam and The Blessed Mother
As this Zenit article points out, although Catholic Christianity and Islam diverge on several aspects regarding the Virgin Mary, there is a significant shared level of honor that both religions accord to her. From this, Mark Shea asks what I think to be a very intriguing question: Given the general phobia that Protestant Evangelicals and Fundamentalists have toward according respectful honor to The Blessed Mother, how effective are they in converting Muslims to not just Christianity, but to Protestantism? If there are any numbers on this, I'd love to see them.
As this Zenit article points out, although Catholic Christianity and Islam diverge on several aspects regarding the Virgin Mary, there is a significant shared level of honor that both religions accord to her. From this, Mark Shea asks what I think to be a very intriguing question: Given the general phobia that Protestant Evangelicals and Fundamentalists have toward according respectful honor to The Blessed Mother, how effective are they in converting Muslims to not just Christianity, but to Protestantism? If there are any numbers on this, I'd love to see them.
How You Were Conceived and to Whom You Are Born to Determines Whether You Have a Right to Live
Yet another sad and bad judicial decision in Florida.
Yet another sad and bad judicial decision in Florida.
Wednesday, May 28, 2003
"Saving" Gays is an Issue of Religion, Not Politics
So says David Horowitz, who responds to demands that he apologize to Christian conservatives.
Why do I owe Christians an apology, since I have not attacked Christians? To accuse a Jew of attacking Christians is a serious matter and goes to the heart of the political problem that "social conservatives" often create for themselves when they intrude religion into the political sphere. Why is religion even an issue in what should be entirely a political discussion?
So says David Horowitz, who responds to demands that he apologize to Christian conservatives.
Why do I owe Christians an apology, since I have not attacked Christians? To accuse a Jew of attacking Christians is a serious matter and goes to the heart of the political problem that "social conservatives" often create for themselves when they intrude religion into the political sphere. Why is religion even an issue in what should be entirely a political discussion?
Tuesday, May 27, 2003
Friday, May 23, 2003
Thursday, May 22, 2003
Well Excuse Him for Being Catholic
Cardinal Arnize's remarks about homosexuality during a Georgetown graduation ceremony draws fire.
Ed Ingebretsen, a professor of English at Georgetown and a priest in the American Catholic Church, said on Wednesday that Cardinal Arinze's remarks were in line with Catholic doctrine, but nonetheless seemed out of place at the commencement ceremony.
"These things are exactly what he's paid to say," Professor Ingebretsen said. "[But] it's a graduation; why he decided to do the pro-family thing no one seems to know."
Professor Ingebretsen said he was compelled, as a writer, to post a short apology on the email subscription list "on behalf of Catholics" for Cardinal Arinze's "insensitive remarks", which he termed "un-Christian".
Could someone please explain to me how Cardinal Arinze's remarks can be consistent with Catholic doctrine on the one hand, yet "un-Christian" on the other? What the heck are the Jesuits smoking?
Cardinal Arnize's remarks about homosexuality during a Georgetown graduation ceremony draws fire.
Ed Ingebretsen, a professor of English at Georgetown and a priest in the American Catholic Church, said on Wednesday that Cardinal Arinze's remarks were in line with Catholic doctrine, but nonetheless seemed out of place at the commencement ceremony.
"These things are exactly what he's paid to say," Professor Ingebretsen said. "[But] it's a graduation; why he decided to do the pro-family thing no one seems to know."
Professor Ingebretsen said he was compelled, as a writer, to post a short apology on the email subscription list "on behalf of Catholics" for Cardinal Arinze's "insensitive remarks", which he termed "un-Christian".
Could someone please explain to me how Cardinal Arinze's remarks can be consistent with Catholic doctrine on the one hand, yet "un-Christian" on the other? What the heck are the Jesuits smoking?
Wednesday, May 21, 2003
SCOTUS Punts Sectarian Prayer Case
Last year, a California state appellate court ruled that a city council sponosored invocation in which Jesus Christ was referred to was unconstitutional. On appeal, the California Supreme Court refused to review the matter, and now the SCOTUS has done the same. That's too bad, since I believe there is sufficient case law to uphold the constitutionality of a government sponsored "sectarian" prayer/invocation (See, e.g., Marsh v. Chambers).
Last year, a California state appellate court ruled that a city council sponosored invocation in which Jesus Christ was referred to was unconstitutional. On appeal, the California Supreme Court refused to review the matter, and now the SCOTUS has done the same. That's too bad, since I believe there is sufficient case law to uphold the constitutionality of a government sponsored "sectarian" prayer/invocation (See, e.g., Marsh v. Chambers).
Monday, May 19, 2003
Lookism?!
There are apparently several pending employment lawsuits that have been filed by people who claim they were discriminated against on the basis of their attractiveness, or lack thereof. One guy is even claiming his obese appearance makes him eligible to sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
There are apparently several pending employment lawsuits that have been filed by people who claim they were discriminated against on the basis of their attractiveness, or lack thereof. One guy is even claiming his obese appearance makes him eligible to sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
With Apologies to Relapsed Catholic, From Our Bulging "Aw, Lighten Up!" Files
A supermarket chain in Denmark has withdrawn from sale sandals with the images of Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary on them after criticism from religious groups.
What's the "problem"? The images are on the portion of the slipper that the bottom of your foot normally covers.
A supermarket chain in Denmark has withdrawn from sale sandals with the images of Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary on them after criticism from religious groups.
What's the "problem"? The images are on the portion of the slipper that the bottom of your foot normally covers.
SCOTUS Will Review "Vouchers Part II" Case
To a large extent, the case of Davey v. Locke may be more significant than the Cleveland vouchers case the Court ruled on last year. In Davey, the state of Washington has asserted its "Blaine Amedment" law as justification for denying a state scholarship to a college student who wanted to study theology and become a minister. "Blaine Amendments," of course, are laws that specifically prohibit a state government from directly funding any program that is religious in nature, or connected to a religious institution. Several states have these laws, including California, and they were originally fueled by widespread anti-Catholic sentiment during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Although I am not confident that the SCOTUS, as a whole, will address the bigoted origins of "Blaine Amendments", I expect that individual justices like Scalia and Thomas will.
To a large extent, the case of Davey v. Locke may be more significant than the Cleveland vouchers case the Court ruled on last year. In Davey, the state of Washington has asserted its "Blaine Amedment" law as justification for denying a state scholarship to a college student who wanted to study theology and become a minister. "Blaine Amendments," of course, are laws that specifically prohibit a state government from directly funding any program that is religious in nature, or connected to a religious institution. Several states have these laws, including California, and they were originally fueled by widespread anti-Catholic sentiment during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Although I am not confident that the SCOTUS, as a whole, will address the bigoted origins of "Blaine Amendments", I expect that individual justices like Scalia and Thomas will.
Friday, May 16, 2003
Don Quixote Lives!
Larry Klayman's Judicial Watch sues the U.S. Senate over the Democrats filibustering of judicial nominees.
Larry Klayman's Judicial Watch sues the U.S. Senate over the Democrats filibustering of judicial nominees.
School Authorities Penalize Student for Missing Class to Sing at Bush Speaking Event
They must be anti-Bush Democrats. (Link via Drudge)
They must be anti-Bush Democrats. (Link via Drudge)
Thursday, May 15, 2003
Lunar Eclipse Tonight
And the Rapure Index is at 166! Sure am gonna miss all my Fundamentalist and Evangelical friends down here.
And the Rapure Index is at 166! Sure am gonna miss all my Fundamentalist and Evangelical friends down here.
"Everybody Runs"
This is recurrent quip by actor Tom Cruise in Minority Report, a movie that is set in a future where people are arrested for crimes that they think about committing, but have yet to act upon. Well, it looks as though California is getting ever closer to this Big Brother scenario with the state Assembly's passage of AB 458 which, if signed into law by the governor, would require pro-homosexual sensitivity training for all California foster parents. The underlying presumption, of course, for this requirement is that there is something profundly wrong with any person who believes homosexuality to be a disorder, and morally disapproves of any sexual conduct related to it. Thus, in order to prevent future "hate" crimes, the state must take preemptive steps to reorient what it believes to be dangerous thinking among some people. Scary stuff, huh?
This is recurrent quip by actor Tom Cruise in Minority Report, a movie that is set in a future where people are arrested for crimes that they think about committing, but have yet to act upon. Well, it looks as though California is getting ever closer to this Big Brother scenario with the state Assembly's passage of AB 458 which, if signed into law by the governor, would require pro-homosexual sensitivity training for all California foster parents. The underlying presumption, of course, for this requirement is that there is something profundly wrong with any person who believes homosexuality to be a disorder, and morally disapproves of any sexual conduct related to it. Thus, in order to prevent future "hate" crimes, the state must take preemptive steps to reorient what it believes to be dangerous thinking among some people. Scary stuff, huh?
Wednesday, May 14, 2003
Someone Needs a "Time-Out"
...and a conversion to the truth.
Reports published in Roll Call and the Washington Times say [Congressman Jim] Moran (D-Va.) recently got into a shouting match with a priest at Blessed Sacrament Church in Alexandria. Roll Call reports the confrontation followed a Mass in which the homily touched on life-related topics. Moran is reported to have complained to one of the parish priests, who in turn asked Moran, "How can you reconcile yourself as a Catholic with your views on abortion?"
Moran is said to have shot back, "You priests don't know anything about abortion!" According to a parishioner, the priest responded, "Congressman, put away the talking points. Talk to me
as your priest." Roll Call reports a fuming Moran then reportedly walked away, the priest's final comment was, "Congressman, one day you will need me, and I will be here."
...and a conversion to the truth.
Reports published in Roll Call and the Washington Times say [Congressman Jim] Moran (D-Va.) recently got into a shouting match with a priest at Blessed Sacrament Church in Alexandria. Roll Call reports the confrontation followed a Mass in which the homily touched on life-related topics. Moran is reported to have complained to one of the parish priests, who in turn asked Moran, "How can you reconcile yourself as a Catholic with your views on abortion?"
Moran is said to have shot back, "You priests don't know anything about abortion!" According to a parishioner, the priest responded, "Congressman, put away the talking points. Talk to me
as your priest." Roll Call reports a fuming Moran then reportedly walked away, the priest's final comment was, "Congressman, one day you will need me, and I will be here."
Tuesday, May 13, 2003
Scoring Error May Cost Some New Lawyers Their "Ticket"
I smell many lawsuits.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners, which produces the 200-question multistate portion of the bar exam taken in almost every state, last week warned bar officials in 48 states that the scores of all 20,204 law students who took the test in February are being recalculated because of a clerical mistake.
...
"The scoring error was detected and every jurisdiction is affected," said Erica Moeser, president of the national conference. "The error is being corrected" as quickly as possible and states are being notified, she said. The problem was discovered at the beginning of May.
I smell many lawsuits.
The National Conference of Bar Examiners, which produces the 200-question multistate portion of the bar exam taken in almost every state, last week warned bar officials in 48 states that the scores of all 20,204 law students who took the test in February are being recalculated because of a clerical mistake.
...
"The scoring error was detected and every jurisdiction is affected," said Erica Moeser, president of the national conference. "The error is being corrected" as quickly as possible and states are being notified, she said. The problem was discovered at the beginning of May.
Apparently, Crime Pays When You're Attractive
"We already know that attractiveness affects sentences, but this study found that only a simple word -- 'handsome' or 'pretty' -- has an effect," Per Schioldborg, a psychology professor at the University of Oslo, told Reuters. "I was surprised."
Guess maybe we should extend our equal protection laws to the terminally ugly. Either that or start subsidizing cosmetic surgery with federal and state tax dollars.
"We already know that attractiveness affects sentences, but this study found that only a simple word -- 'handsome' or 'pretty' -- has an effect," Per Schioldborg, a psychology professor at the University of Oslo, told Reuters. "I was surprised."
Guess maybe we should extend our equal protection laws to the terminally ugly. Either that or start subsidizing cosmetic surgery with federal and state tax dollars.
Monday, May 12, 2003
In Case You Haven't Seen It Yet
Here's the California "Catholic Dirty Dozen" ad that American Life League is buying space for in several state newspapers.
I had no idea State Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin was Catholic. Truly disappointing that he favors abortion rights.
Here's the California "Catholic Dirty Dozen" ad that American Life League is buying space for in several state newspapers.
I had no idea State Supreme Court Justice Ming Chin was Catholic. Truly disappointing that he favors abortion rights.
Friday, May 09, 2003
Man Fined for Cheering Gay Neighbor's Death
OK, it wasn't very nice, but how 'bout recognizing a little free speech? Oh yeah, this happened in Germany.
OK, it wasn't very nice, but how 'bout recognizing a little free speech? Oh yeah, this happened in Germany.
Thursday, May 08, 2003
Why Aren't More Catholics "Disappointed" With Bill Bennett?
Generally because we aren't Protestant.
[T]he U.S. Catholic bishops' conference, which has pronounced on virtually every major social problem over the past few decades, has never addressed [legalized gambling] - though individual bishops and groups of bishops have sometimes opposed legalized gambling in their cities and states.
By contrast, both liberal and conservative Protestant church officials have issued repeated denunciations of legalized gambling.
They agree that it's a serious social problem and a sinful practice that builds upon greed and deceit, destroys families, exploits the poor and fosters crime.
...
The catechism of the Catholic Church says wagers "are not in themselves contrary to justice" but "become morally unacceptable" if they deprive people of basic needs.
"The passion for gambling risks becoming an enslavement," the catechism warns.
Generally because we aren't Protestant.
[T]he U.S. Catholic bishops' conference, which has pronounced on virtually every major social problem over the past few decades, has never addressed [legalized gambling] - though individual bishops and groups of bishops have sometimes opposed legalized gambling in their cities and states.
By contrast, both liberal and conservative Protestant church officials have issued repeated denunciations of legalized gambling.
They agree that it's a serious social problem and a sinful practice that builds upon greed and deceit, destroys families, exploits the poor and fosters crime.
...
The catechism of the Catholic Church says wagers "are not in themselves contrary to justice" but "become morally unacceptable" if they deprive people of basic needs.
"The passion for gambling risks becoming an enslavement," the catechism warns.
Graham Openly Criticized for Anti-Islam Remarks by Fellow Evangelical Prots
Paul Marshall, senior fellow at the Center for Religious Freedom, a human rights group, said anti-Islam comments serve only to antagonize people. "Exactly what is to be achieved by that except boosting the ego of who said it?" he asked.
Going off on a tangent, one thing I'm sort of curious about is whether the average Muslim in the Middle East makes any kind of a distinction between Christianity and the Catholic Church. In other words, would an average Middle Eastern Muslim automatically associate an Evangelical Protestant missionary he sees or hears about with the Catholic Church? Hmmm...
Clairification: I'm reading what I wrote above, and I seem to be suggesting that the Catholic Church, of which I am devout member, isn't Christian. What I meant to inquire on was whether the average Muslim in the Middle East was aware of any other kind of Christianity aside from that which (fully) subsists in the Catholic Church.
Paul Marshall, senior fellow at the Center for Religious Freedom, a human rights group, said anti-Islam comments serve only to antagonize people. "Exactly what is to be achieved by that except boosting the ego of who said it?" he asked.
Going off on a tangent, one thing I'm sort of curious about is whether the average Muslim in the Middle East makes any kind of a distinction between Christianity and the Catholic Church. In other words, would an average Middle Eastern Muslim automatically associate an Evangelical Protestant missionary he sees or hears about with the Catholic Church? Hmmm...
Clairification: I'm reading what I wrote above, and I seem to be suggesting that the Catholic Church, of which I am devout member, isn't Christian. What I meant to inquire on was whether the average Muslim in the Middle East was aware of any other kind of Christianity aside from that which (fully) subsists in the Catholic Church.
Tuesday, May 06, 2003
Dobson on Bennett
"We were disappointed to learn that our longtime friend, Dr. Bill Bennett, is dealing with what appears to be a gambling addiction. One of the reasons Focus on the Family continues to be strongly opposed to any form of gambling is because it has the power to ensnare and wound not only its victims, but also those closest to them. 'Gaming,' as the industry euphemistically refers to itself, is a cancer on the soul of the nation.
However, if Bennett was a recreational masturbator, Dobson's opinion would seemingly be different.
"We were disappointed to learn that our longtime friend, Dr. Bill Bennett, is dealing with what appears to be a gambling addiction. One of the reasons Focus on the Family continues to be strongly opposed to any form of gambling is because it has the power to ensnare and wound not only its victims, but also those closest to them. 'Gaming,' as the industry euphemistically refers to itself, is a cancer on the soul of the nation.
However, if Bennett was a recreational masturbator, Dobson's opinion would seemingly be different.
Monday, May 05, 2003
Happy Now Leftys and Moral Relativists?
Statement from William Bennett (via Drudge): 'A number of stories in the media have reported that I have engaged in high stakes gambling over the past decade. It is true that I have gambled large sums of money. I have also complied with all laws on reporting wins and losses.
Nevertheless, I have done too much gambling, and this is not an example I wish to set. Therefore, my gambling days are over...'
Much has been said about this issue on various other Catholic blogs, but I'm basically of the position that as long as his gambling isn't endangering the well-being of his family, and he isn't knowingly contributing to any illegal enterprises, William Bennett should not be disqualified from being a respected public moralist. But even if Bennett's gambling was problematic, his status as a public moralist should still be secure as long as he takes responsibility for the wrongs he has done, and he doesn't repeat them. We could only have hoped so much out of Bill Clinton who, at last check, still has yet to explcitly admit that he had an extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky, publicly lied about the affair ever occurring, and committed criminal perjury about it during his testimony in a civil trial. Under such circumstance, "Slick Willy" is absolutely precluded from ever telling anyone what is and isn't right.
Statement from William Bennett (via Drudge): 'A number of stories in the media have reported that I have engaged in high stakes gambling over the past decade. It is true that I have gambled large sums of money. I have also complied with all laws on reporting wins and losses.
Nevertheless, I have done too much gambling, and this is not an example I wish to set. Therefore, my gambling days are over...'
Much has been said about this issue on various other Catholic blogs, but I'm basically of the position that as long as his gambling isn't endangering the well-being of his family, and he isn't knowingly contributing to any illegal enterprises, William Bennett should not be disqualified from being a respected public moralist. But even if Bennett's gambling was problematic, his status as a public moralist should still be secure as long as he takes responsibility for the wrongs he has done, and he doesn't repeat them. We could only have hoped so much out of Bill Clinton who, at last check, still has yet to explcitly admit that he had an extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky, publicly lied about the affair ever occurring, and committed criminal perjury about it during his testimony in a civil trial. Under such circumstance, "Slick Willy" is absolutely precluded from ever telling anyone what is and isn't right.
"Cuomo-ism" Filters Into Marriage Issue
In case you don't know what "Cuomo-ism" is, it is named after former New York Governor Mario Cuomo who made famous the intellectually dishonest belief of being personally against abortion but favoring a woman's "right to choose".
According to this poll, there is one county in New Jersey where a majority of Catholics seem to be personally against homosexual "marriages", but favor its offical recognition on a state-wide level.
In case you don't know what "Cuomo-ism" is, it is named after former New York Governor Mario Cuomo who made famous the intellectually dishonest belief of being personally against abortion but favoring a woman's "right to choose".
According to this poll, there is one county in New Jersey where a majority of Catholics seem to be personally against homosexual "marriages", but favor its offical recognition on a state-wide level.
How do You Prevent People From Smuggling Bombs and Boxcutters Onto Airplanes?
Make 'em all fly nekkid. (Link via Drudge)
Make 'em all fly nekkid. (Link via Drudge)
Saturday, May 03, 2003
To Quote Keanu Reeves, "Whoa!"
In striking down most of the McCain-Feingold campain finance law, the DC Court of Appeals issues a 1,600 page ruling. There must have been some bleary-eyed law clerks on this one.
In striking down most of the McCain-Feingold campain finance law, the DC Court of Appeals issues a 1,600 page ruling. There must have been some bleary-eyed law clerks on this one.
Friday, May 02, 2003
The L.A. Times: Sprinting Toward Gomorrah
By awarding a Los Angeles Times Book Prize to the odious "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex," by Judith Levine, the Times has embraced pedophilia chic as its latest cause..."Harmful to Minors," published by the University of Minnesota Press, calls for lowering the age of sexual consent to 12, and teaching children about sex with other children and with adults, in all varieties. Levine praises a child-care center where "children of all ages may engage in masturbation without shame and consensual child-with-child sexual touching without adult interference" (p. 183). She promotes "outercourse," which "returns lovers to what Freud called polymorphous perversity – the infantile state of full-body sensuality, in which various body parts don't enjoy greater or lesser respect or greater or lesser capacity for pleasure. Male, female or transgendered, we all have mouths, necks, toes, anuses, brains, and nerve endings" (p.196).
By awarding a Los Angeles Times Book Prize to the odious "Harmful to Minors: The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex," by Judith Levine, the Times has embraced pedophilia chic as its latest cause..."Harmful to Minors," published by the University of Minnesota Press, calls for lowering the age of sexual consent to 12, and teaching children about sex with other children and with adults, in all varieties. Levine praises a child-care center where "children of all ages may engage in masturbation without shame and consensual child-with-child sexual touching without adult interference" (p. 183). She promotes "outercourse," which "returns lovers to what Freud called polymorphous perversity – the infantile state of full-body sensuality, in which various body parts don't enjoy greater or lesser respect or greater or lesser capacity for pleasure. Male, female or transgendered, we all have mouths, necks, toes, anuses, brains, and nerve endings" (p.196).
Christian-Based Adoption Agency Sued by Lezbos
The interesting, and unreported, aspect to this case is that there is a specific provision in the California Family Code that does not prohibit foster/adoption agencies from discriminating against parent applicants on the basis of sexual (dis)orientation. As a matter of fact, there was a bill introduced last year in the California Legislature that would have prohibited this type of discrimination (thankfully, it was an election year and Davis vetoed it). In light of this, the foster/adoption agency being sued here should theoretically win. Again, though, I'm not the judge.
The interesting, and unreported, aspect to this case is that there is a specific provision in the California Family Code that does not prohibit foster/adoption agencies from discriminating against parent applicants on the basis of sexual (dis)orientation. As a matter of fact, there was a bill introduced last year in the California Legislature that would have prohibited this type of discrimination (thankfully, it was an election year and Davis vetoed it). In light of this, the foster/adoption agency being sued here should theoretically win. Again, though, I'm not the judge.
So Much for Her Coming Back to the Church I Guess
"All women are goddesses," [Nicole] Kidman decreed to us, "even when they're in the kitchen making pancakes for their kids. Boyfriends need to understand that if women are worshiped, the world will be a better place."
And check out this gem of a quote: Kim Cattrall reassured us that her goddess sect is "all pleasure and no pain. But devotion can be complicated. Because I think the Judeo-Christians really got in the way of goddess worship."
The "Judeo-Christians"?
"All women are goddesses," [Nicole] Kidman decreed to us, "even when they're in the kitchen making pancakes for their kids. Boyfriends need to understand that if women are worshiped, the world will be a better place."
And check out this gem of a quote: Kim Cattrall reassured us that her goddess sect is "all pleasure and no pain. But devotion can be complicated. Because I think the Judeo-Christians really got in the way of goddess worship."
The "Judeo-Christians"?
Another Backhanded Media Slap at the Church?
A short list of different Christian denominations, and their rules for receiving Communion. While this article correctly, though incompletely, points out what the Catholic Church believes about the Eucharist, it wholly ignores the fact that Protestants have a contrary belief, and is thus a main reason for why Communion in the Catholic Church is "closed". I smell secret anti-Catholic agenda.
A short list of different Christian denominations, and their rules for receiving Communion. While this article correctly, though incompletely, points out what the Catholic Church believes about the Eucharist, it wholly ignores the fact that Protestants have a contrary belief, and is thus a main reason for why Communion in the Catholic Church is "closed". I smell secret anti-Catholic agenda.
Thursday, May 01, 2003
Expanding the Meaning of "Sexual Harassment"?
A homosexual male is suing his employer under Title VII for uncharitable statements made by heterosexual male co-workers. The plaintiff in this case is positing that he is a victim of unlawful "gender stereotyping". In other words, just as it is unlawful for an employer to terminate (actually or constructively) a woman for "acting too much like a man", the plaintiff here is arguing that he was constructively terminated by his employer's failure to adequately punish those co-workers who were harassing him for not being enough of a "real man". The significant distinction that I see here, however, is that when one alleges that a woman is acting too much like a man, the woman is not necessarily being criticized because of her sexual desire or orientation. That appears to be the situation with the plaintiff here, and since there is no cause of action under Title VII for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, the defendant/employer should win. Then again, I'm not the judge.
A homosexual male is suing his employer under Title VII for uncharitable statements made by heterosexual male co-workers. The plaintiff in this case is positing that he is a victim of unlawful "gender stereotyping". In other words, just as it is unlawful for an employer to terminate (actually or constructively) a woman for "acting too much like a man", the plaintiff here is arguing that he was constructively terminated by his employer's failure to adequately punish those co-workers who were harassing him for not being enough of a "real man". The significant distinction that I see here, however, is that when one alleges that a woman is acting too much like a man, the woman is not necessarily being criticized because of her sexual desire or orientation. That appears to be the situation with the plaintiff here, and since there is no cause of action under Title VII for discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, the defendant/employer should win. Then again, I'm not the judge.
Wednesday, April 30, 2003
Query
I was listening to a morning talk-radio show today, and the on-air personalities were talking about some comments that a player for the Colorado Rockies made on he would feel if he played with a teammate who was openly homosexual. Inevitably, the guy who reports all the sports news for the show made a somewhat offhand comparison between a person who has homosexual tendencies and race. When one considers the presumptions that are involved, why do so many people do this? It would seem to me that if homosexual orientation is equivalent to race or ethnicity, then it should follow that persons of a particular race or ethnicity ought to be expected to behave in a certain manner. But since we all know that this mentality amounts to racism, it absolutley mystifies me why so many people make homosexuality the equivalent of race (unless, of course, they're all racists).
I was listening to a morning talk-radio show today, and the on-air personalities were talking about some comments that a player for the Colorado Rockies made on he would feel if he played with a teammate who was openly homosexual. Inevitably, the guy who reports all the sports news for the show made a somewhat offhand comparison between a person who has homosexual tendencies and race. When one considers the presumptions that are involved, why do so many people do this? It would seem to me that if homosexual orientation is equivalent to race or ethnicity, then it should follow that persons of a particular race or ethnicity ought to be expected to behave in a certain manner. But since we all know that this mentality amounts to racism, it absolutley mystifies me why so many people make homosexuality the equivalent of race (unless, of course, they're all racists).
Positively Orwellian
California review board recommends omitting "insensitive" words and phrases from textbooks.
The Founding Fathers, for instance, are now referred to as "The Framers," in an apparent effort to make them sound less male-dominant. And there will be no more reading about Mount Rushmore, where the faces of four U.S. presidents are carved into stone, because it appears to offend some American-Indian groups...Snowman? No more. Melt that image and replace with Snowperson. Want to sail away on a yacht? No, again. It’s too elitist.
California review board recommends omitting "insensitive" words and phrases from textbooks.
The Founding Fathers, for instance, are now referred to as "The Framers," in an apparent effort to make them sound less male-dominant. And there will be no more reading about Mount Rushmore, where the faces of four U.S. presidents are carved into stone, because it appears to offend some American-Indian groups...Snowman? No more. Melt that image and replace with Snowperson. Want to sail away on a yacht? No, again. It’s too elitist.
Tuesday, April 29, 2003
Hell Hath No Fury...
An allegedly lovesick 20-year-old woman is being blamed for making a threat that diverted a cruise ship and cost taxpayers a lot of money.
Kelley Marie Ferguson, 20, from Laguna Hills, Calif. was apparently not happy to be on board the Legend of the Seas. Four days after leaving Mexico, prosecutors said she wrote two notes she hoped would force the ship to turn back.
Keep in mind she did this because she missed her boyfriend. I'd sure hate to see how she would react if her boyfirend ever broke up with her.
An allegedly lovesick 20-year-old woman is being blamed for making a threat that diverted a cruise ship and cost taxpayers a lot of money.
Kelley Marie Ferguson, 20, from Laguna Hills, Calif. was apparently not happy to be on board the Legend of the Seas. Four days after leaving Mexico, prosecutors said she wrote two notes she hoped would force the ship to turn back.
Keep in mind she did this because she missed her boyfriend. I'd sure hate to see how she would react if her boyfirend ever broke up with her.
Will of the People Shmill of the Smeeple
City Council of the People's Republic of Davis approve resolution urging the State of California to ignore Prop. 22 and officially recognize "gay marriages".
"I have the deepest respect for those of you who hold this as a religious belief, that marriage is between a man and woman," Mayor Susie Boyd told the public. "... (However,) I think that the civil rights and the legal issues are really what we need to grapple with tonight, and marriage provides certain protections and benefits ... that are people's rights."
How Cuomo-esque. She respects people of traditional religious faith so much that she is willing to attack them by pushing for further state recognition of intrinsically disordered conduct and minimizing the institution of marriage to one of material and legal benefits.
City Council of the People's Republic of Davis approve resolution urging the State of California to ignore Prop. 22 and officially recognize "gay marriages".
"I have the deepest respect for those of you who hold this as a religious belief, that marriage is between a man and woman," Mayor Susie Boyd told the public. "... (However,) I think that the civil rights and the legal issues are really what we need to grapple with tonight, and marriage provides certain protections and benefits ... that are people's rights."
How Cuomo-esque. She respects people of traditional religious faith so much that she is willing to attack them by pushing for further state recognition of intrinsically disordered conduct and minimizing the institution of marriage to one of material and legal benefits.
Monday, April 28, 2003
Battle for the Social Moderate Mind
Stanley Kurtz ruminates on the Santorum flap and how it will seem almost trivial when compared to the impending rumble over "gay marriages".
Stanley Kurtz ruminates on the Santorum flap and how it will seem almost trivial when compared to the impending rumble over "gay marriages".
Friday, April 25, 2003
Toot Toot!
Newark, CA Planning Commission rejects independent Protestant church's conditional use permit application.
Attorneys with the Pacific Justice Institute, a nonprofit organization that works on behalf of churches, said the city would be in violation of the law if it denies Fremont Bible Fellowship's application.
The Religious Land Use Act, passed in 2000, "prohibits cities from outright excluding churches from areas simply because they are religious institutions, unless they have compelling reason," said attorney Roger Ho.
Newark, CA Planning Commission rejects independent Protestant church's conditional use permit application.
Attorneys with the Pacific Justice Institute, a nonprofit organization that works on behalf of churches, said the city would be in violation of the law if it denies Fremont Bible Fellowship's application.
The Religious Land Use Act, passed in 2000, "prohibits cities from outright excluding churches from areas simply because they are religious institutions, unless they have compelling reason," said attorney Roger Ho.
Unintelligent and Unconventional Thinking?
Hardly.
"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything." -- Senator Rick Santorum, 2003
"It would be difficult, except by fiat, to limit the claimed right to homosexual conduct while leaving exposed to prosecution adultery, incest, and other sexual crimes even though they are committed in the home. We are unwilling to start down that road." -- U.S. Supreme Court Majority Opinion, Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
Hardly.
"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything." -- Senator Rick Santorum, 2003
"It would be difficult, except by fiat, to limit the claimed right to homosexual conduct while leaving exposed to prosecution adultery, incest, and other sexual crimes even though they are committed in the home. We are unwilling to start down that road." -- U.S. Supreme Court Majority Opinion, Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
Court Says File Sharing Tools are Legal
Link via Drudge.
In an almost complete reversal of previous victories for the record labels and movie studios, federal court Judge Stephen Wilson ruled that Streamcast--parent of the Morpheus software--and Grokster were not liable for copyright infringements that took place using their software... "Defendants distribute and support software, the users of which can and do choose to employ it for both lawful and unlawful ends," Wilson wrote in his opinion, released Friday. "Grokster and Streamcast are not significantly different from companies that sell home video recorders or copy machines, both of which can be and are used to infringe copyrights."
Link via Drudge.
In an almost complete reversal of previous victories for the record labels and movie studios, federal court Judge Stephen Wilson ruled that Streamcast--parent of the Morpheus software--and Grokster were not liable for copyright infringements that took place using their software... "Defendants distribute and support software, the users of which can and do choose to employ it for both lawful and unlawful ends," Wilson wrote in his opinion, released Friday. "Grokster and Streamcast are not significantly different from companies that sell home video recorders or copy machines, both of which can be and are used to infringe copyrights."
Darwin Award Candidate
A court appearance for a traffic citation turned into a more serious problem for a Carlsbad teen when he dropped a marijuana joint in the courtroom.
This story reminds me of the anti-drug commercial with the egg and the frying pan. Classic.
A court appearance for a traffic citation turned into a more serious problem for a Carlsbad teen when he dropped a marijuana joint in the courtroom.
This story reminds me of the anti-drug commercial with the egg and the frying pan. Classic.
Strange Bedfellows in "We Just Don't Do It" Case
Former Bush v. Gore adversaries team up in support of the company made famous by Michael Jordan.
At issue is whether Nike, the athletic apparel maker, can be sued by private individuals like California activist Marc Kasky under state unfair competition laws for statements the company has made in defense of its overseas labor practices.
[Lawrence] Tribe, representing Nike, couldn't be happier that his former adversary [U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson] will be at his side. "The two of us have known, respected and liked one another for many years. That's been true when we have opposed one another and when we have supported one another," Tribe says. "I much prefer to be arguing with Ted than against him."
Former Bush v. Gore adversaries team up in support of the company made famous by Michael Jordan.
At issue is whether Nike, the athletic apparel maker, can be sued by private individuals like California activist Marc Kasky under state unfair competition laws for statements the company has made in defense of its overseas labor practices.
[Lawrence] Tribe, representing Nike, couldn't be happier that his former adversary [U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson] will be at his side. "The two of us have known, respected and liked one another for many years. That's been true when we have opposed one another and when we have supported one another," Tribe says. "I much prefer to be arguing with Ted than against him."
Thursday, April 24, 2003
Teacher's Aide Fights Suspension for Wearing Cross Necklace
What are the chances that this school would probably have no problem with an employee wearing something like a pro-gay rainbow flag lapel pin?
What are the chances that this school would probably have no problem with an employee wearing something like a pro-gay rainbow flag lapel pin?
Order to Cut Life Support for Abused Baby Upheld
Wednesday's action by [California's] highest court could lead to a murder charge against the father if little Christopher Ibarra dies.
A juvenile court had previously ruled that life support be discontinued for Christopher, and the 4th District Court of Appeals upheld that decision in February. The appeals court concluded that Christopher was left in a persistent, vegetative state, neurologically devastated and was receiving no benefit from life support.
I happen to know the attorney for the father in this case, and as the news story indicates, he tried to argue that the state should not be in the business of deciding whether to end the life of an innocent and defenseless child. I see his point to some extent, but I'm not so sure that ordering life support to be terminated in this kind of a situation can be rightly characterized as an affirmative act of killing. It seems to be more in line with terminally ill patients who don't want to artificially prolong their life, and would rather allow what is afflicting them to run its natural course. In this case, the state is not responsible for this child's imminent death, but rather his dirt bag of a father.
Wednesday's action by [California's] highest court could lead to a murder charge against the father if little Christopher Ibarra dies.
A juvenile court had previously ruled that life support be discontinued for Christopher, and the 4th District Court of Appeals upheld that decision in February. The appeals court concluded that Christopher was left in a persistent, vegetative state, neurologically devastated and was receiving no benefit from life support.
I happen to know the attorney for the father in this case, and as the news story indicates, he tried to argue that the state should not be in the business of deciding whether to end the life of an innocent and defenseless child. I see his point to some extent, but I'm not so sure that ordering life support to be terminated in this kind of a situation can be rightly characterized as an affirmative act of killing. It seems to be more in line with terminally ill patients who don't want to artificially prolong their life, and would rather allow what is afflicting them to run its natural course. In this case, the state is not responsible for this child's imminent death, but rather his dirt bag of a father.
Santorum Must Be Doing Something Right
'Cause now the polygamists are attacking him. Wonder if the pro-gay groups and their morally relativistic sympathizers will join forces with them.
'Cause now the polygamists are attacking him. Wonder if the pro-gay groups and their morally relativistic sympathizers will join forces with them.
Wednesday, April 23, 2003
Rick Santorum Rocks!
Here's the interview that's got the Liberal Left wringing their hands and calling for Santorum's head.
Update: Santorum defends his comments. The one thing I don't get is why he feels he has to deny that practicing gay men are not the moral (or immoral) equivalent of adulterers or polygamists. Deviant behavior is deviant behavior. Moreover, being gay is no more equivalent to being black than being an adulterer is equivalent to being Asian. As such, there is nothing bigoted about opposing people who defend and/or practice homosexuality.
Here's the interview that's got the Liberal Left wringing their hands and calling for Santorum's head.
Update: Santorum defends his comments. The one thing I don't get is why he feels he has to deny that practicing gay men are not the moral (or immoral) equivalent of adulterers or polygamists. Deviant behavior is deviant behavior. Moreover, being gay is no more equivalent to being black than being an adulterer is equivalent to being Asian. As such, there is nothing bigoted about opposing people who defend and/or practice homosexuality.
Tuesday, April 22, 2003
Different Strokes...
For some women, Ari Fleischer is The Man.
But women who hold onto fantasies of being swept away by their bald-headed Prince Ari will have to keep on dreaming: Alas, Fleischer, 42, married 26-year-old Rebecca Davis in late 2002.
For some women, Ari Fleischer is The Man.
But women who hold onto fantasies of being swept away by their bald-headed Prince Ari will have to keep on dreaming: Alas, Fleischer, 42, married 26-year-old Rebecca Davis in late 2002.
Monday, April 21, 2003
Ethics Violation?
Regarding the Laci Peterson murder, is California Attorney General Bill Lockyer allowed to make brazen comments that could taint a potential jury pool? Several times over the weekend, Lockyer has been shown on television news reports saying that he believes the case against Scott Peterson is a "slam dunk". In light of this, and the fact that this is a high profile case, I'm not sure it can be legitimately argued that Scott Peterson will be afforded an impartial jury of his peers. I'd appreciate it if anyone can help me out on this.
Regarding the Laci Peterson murder, is California Attorney General Bill Lockyer allowed to make brazen comments that could taint a potential jury pool? Several times over the weekend, Lockyer has been shown on television news reports saying that he believes the case against Scott Peterson is a "slam dunk". In light of this, and the fact that this is a high profile case, I'm not sure it can be legitimately argued that Scott Peterson will be afforded an impartial jury of his peers. I'd appreciate it if anyone can help me out on this.
Miranda Revisited
The SCOTUS has agreed to review a case where police seized critical evidence after only reading a suspect part of his Miranda rights.
The SCOTUS has agreed to review a case where police seized critical evidence after only reading a suspect part of his Miranda rights.
Saddam Sarandan's T.V. Movie Bombs
Has CBS hired Baghdad Bob as a spokesman?
"Sure, [ICE BOUND] was a disappointment in the ratings," a CBS source said Monday from New York. "But Susan's acting was terrific and we are very proud to have aired the movie."
Has CBS hired Baghdad Bob as a spokesman?
"Sure, [ICE BOUND] was a disappointment in the ratings," a CBS source said Monday from New York. "But Susan's acting was terrific and we are very proud to have aired the movie."
Moderate Lefebvre-ites Coming Back
The Rome daily newspaper Il Messaggero said that this would mark a victory for the Pope in the battle for the “soul of the Church”, which had been going on since Vatican II in the 1960s.
The Rome daily newspaper Il Messaggero said that this would mark a victory for the Pope in the battle for the “soul of the Church”, which had been going on since Vatican II in the 1960s.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)